Voting is a form of Insanity – Nobody for President 2016

We have been saying this for years. The vote is rigged. Voting for the devil you know or the best of the worst, is not an acceptable way to run a corporation. I mean COUNTRY.

I heard this guy on reddit and like his views. Check it out!

Tags for the “web” to “crawl”:
votecoin, internet voting, voting, election, 2016, web voting, encryption, sha-256, sha256, safe, secure, private, ballot, machines, hack, news, btc, bitcoin, blockchain, blockchain voting, voter fraud, fraud, aware, ethereum,

#voting #votecoin #democracy #internet #voting #ballots #vote-coin #vote #coin #veto #public #votechain #blockchain #bitcoin #btc #satoshi #auditable #freedom #president #polls #speeches #budget #internetvoting #votetoken #token #bitcongress #votechain #audit #nes #politics #technology #tech #news #world #suffrage #equalrights #classwar #classwarfare #classism #blackbox #democracy #republican #freeman #strawman #gerrymandering #jerrymandering #manipulation #election #cryptovote #cryptovoting #openvote #freevote #internetvoting #netvote #votecoin #internetvoting #voting, #election #encryption #trump

Internet voting is SAFE: If the internet voting technology is executed properly, it’s improbable that it will be hacked, especially if the U.S. handles it like online banking but double the login procedures, and if the login portal requires ALL users to do this: 1. Use SHA-256 encryption hashing, and the user submits a test vote, and then have to verify that test vote using all the same credentials.
2. Use 2-3 step verification every step of the way. Such as google’s 2 step (
3. Vote within a safe portal, that auto times out after 3 minutes, so no one’s vote can be stolen. 4. At login require 4-5 security questions to login. Questions must be changed semi-annually. 5. Use a blockchain-like ID verification system where each user gets to “spend” their vote once, each election, after going through a very safe ID verification process.
6. Down stream: Allow the voters to redact their vote if they are being held by a captor, or bribed, or abused in domestic violence at home.

For more information check out: ThreeBallot voting protocol vVote: Archived 1999 Voting subs on reddit:

Internet voting in 2016 will be the only way to keep the war mongers, reality stars, and self-elected shillionaires out of the white house. The U.S. needs to run a parallel internet vote to ensure the leader ship of the country is not stolen again.

Various U.S. Leaders and officials are traitors, and should be tried as so. U.S. citizens need to regroup and realize their own overloads, tax collectors, and county “officials” are the actual terrorists. Unfortunately, due to the heavy TV/statist school programming, citizens have come to recognize terrorists come from the far region of the Middle East. Most citizens can’t even tell you geographically where or why we a pumping billions into Israel and these regions… citizens acquiesce and watch the tax dollars disappears in the form of hummer exhaust. Maybe once the shit lords who are dumping the chemicals concede to themselves, in their own heart and soul, that they are the true terrorists, these perpetrators will have a moment of self realization and begin to change, or they may be too far down the path and never repent. I believe that anyone is capable of turning their life around to do good… and it’s never too late to change the path you are on. One can change their ways. Some of the criminals and cohorts behind the poisoning of the masses, it may be better for the U.S. if they take their own lives, and deal with it this way. Maybe if these so-called officials realize many citizens view them worse than they view 3rd world radicalized Syrian civilian militants – and they realize how many “officials” are terrorists, the dialogue will change. It should be a law the U.S. “journalists” refer to these U.S. employed perpetrators as terrorists, to emphasize the gravity of this matter.

Voting machine password hacks as easy as ABC

There is more proof than ever that our current system for “voting” is not sufficient to support our growing populace and growing demand for fairness.

The purpose of this blog it to curate voting news and pertinent information about our current state of voting technology, so that we may improve on it. I believe the flawed voting system is inhibiting the citizens choose the now so-called leaders, and that this 70 year old technology should be updated in order for humanities politics to evolve.

If we continue to use a knowingly flawed and archaic voting technology we will continue to get a flawed outcome, which is an actor that has not been fully chosen by the people.
The solution: We propose that a new type of voting technology be put in place. Such technology has been discussed the past 20 years, and may include a cryptography based system where citizens vote with a “vote coin” and all votes are public and audit-able at a public level by the computer savvy. This ensures a clear and transparent environment so that citizens can peer into the inner working of the voter process.

Check out article on how voting machines can be hacked:


Touchscreen voting machines used in numerous elections between 2002 and 2014 used “abcde” and “admin” as passwords and could easily have been hacked from the parking lot outside the polling place, according to a state report.

The AVS WinVote machines, used in three presidential elections in Virginia, “would get an F-minus” in security, according to a computer scientist at tech research group SRI International who had pushed for a formal inquiry by the state of Virginia for close to a decade.

In a damning study published Tuesday, the Virginia Information Technology Agency and outside contractor Pro V&V found numerous flaws in the system, which had also been used in Mississippi and Pennsylvania.

Jeremy Epstein, of the Menlo Park, California, nonprofit SRI International, served on a Virginia state legislative commission investigating the voting machines in 2008. He has been trying to get them decertified ever since.

Anyone within a half mile could have modified every vote, undetected, Epstein said in a blog post. “I got to question a guy by the name of Brit Williams, who’d certified them, and I said, ‘How did you do a penetration test?’” Epstein told the Guardian, “and he said, ‘I don’t know how to do something like that’.”

Reached by phone, Williams, who has since retired, said he did not recall the incident and referred the Guardian to former colleagues at Kennesaw State University who have taken over the certification duties he used to perform for Virginia and other states.

“You could have broken into one of these with a very small amount of technical assistance,” Epstein said. “I could teach you how to do it over the phone. It might require an administrator password, but that’s okay, the password is ‘admin’.”

Bypassing the encrypted WEP wireless system also proved easy. The password turned out to be “ABCDE”, according to the state’s security assessment – and getting the password “would take a few minutes and after that you don’t need any tools at all”, said Epstein.”

Vote Coin conceptualized and invented by Charles Level in 2013 VoteCoin©™

Thank you for visiting the official Vote Coin blog.

Vote Coin is an open source voting system. It was inspired by bitcoin in 2012, and allows for citizens to vote for candidates with a transparent system.

What makes Vote Coin different from the traditional 70 year old voting technologies, is that Vote Coin is transparent to everyone and allows for voting from anywhere there is an internet connection. After the so-called elections are closed, computer savvy individuals will have public access if they desire to audit the chain of votes which will have unique hash IDs. This will make sure that all the votes are tallied legally, and accurately. The Vote Coin ledger will then be backed up, and published, so that it can be audited at any point in the future. No system is perfect, but with a free and open system citizens have the chance to improve on the technology.

When was the idea of cryptographic voting conceived?

Voting technology is a taboo discussion because many people do not want to jeopardize their jobs and stature by challenging the now archaic voting system.  But discussions of a cryptography based voting system can be traced back to several discussion boards over the past 15 years. One such paper is the Chris Karlof paper called “Cryptographic Voting Protocols: A Systems Perspective”

Recent Vote Coin concept:

Early in 2013 when bitcoin was starting to bloom and gain major mainstream attention, Charles Level started posting theories, ideological concepts, and starting various discussions about Vote Coin (votecoin VoteCoin©™ ). About 100 posts were made by Charles Level to Reddit categories, over the years, and several individuals and entities claimed to have created vote coin, and even started a sub category called /r/votecoin.

In 2014 a fictional person calling themselves “Steven Funk” perpetrated to create the idea of “Votecoin” and started a page on a so-called crowd funding site called This was not the first instance of VoteCoin being discussed. Our team has followed their so-called “fund raising campaign” but have not seen any credible mainstream evidence that their code was created or successfully implements.

#vote #coin #votecoin #democracy

Proof this was started by Charles Level:

votecoin 2013 VoteCoin©™